The ancient city

The Ancient City Pompeii “How classless was Pompeian government?” In give to answer the above question, it is first necessary to consider the carry meaning of the term “ body politic”. Whilst it is difficult to give an engage definition of the word, it is certainly possible to create a proclivity of the implications of democratic governing for a smart set and its citizens. Perhaps the around obvious of these implications, certainly when considered from a modern standpoint, would be that either full member of a society would be considered as being extend to, and thus would have an equal say in the running and appointing of a government. Secondly, truly democratic government would in addition imply that every member of society would have an equal opportunity to be elected to a governmental position. much(prenominal) an opportunity should at least, in theory anyway, not be reliant on social class or position, nor fiscal support. Finally, the existence of a truly democratic system of government would also imply that governments be periodically elected, and during any condition term of government, politicians would be fully employed by the domain in the running of the country.

Given such implications of democracy, Pompeian politics would fall out at first appraisal to hardly be democratic at all. Certainly, it can be said that the politics of Pompeii in particular and by extension the politics of Roman society as a whole do not twin the modern, Western ideas of a relatively liberal, democratic society. However, such a modern, Western idea of democracy was one that was entirely foreigner to the citizens of Pompeii and to the citizens of many ancient civilizations. Therefore, the nature of Pompeian politics must be considered not only from a modern governmental standpoint, solely also from a standpoint more relative to the political ideals of Pompeian society and the Roman Empire, where a very different stratum of democracy was in existence.



Whilst such a form of democracy is very different to that of like a shot, it is certainly accurate to say that thither was at least some element of democracy in Pompeian politics. Without such an element of democracy, however small, Pompeii would have been run close entirely by dictatorship, which would have resulted in an entirely oppressive system of government, or alternatively the reverse situation king have arisen with the arrival of anarchy. Since Pompeii was never entirely run by one individual autocrat or dictator, and never descended into do it anarchy, it must be true to say that in Pompeian politics there was always some small element of democracy, blush if such democracy bares hardly any resemblance to today’s ideas of democracy.

If you want to get a full essay, request it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.